-
CA Court's okay same sex marriage!
2008-05-16 02:14:09
This is the most wonderful news I hear this year!
Bravo, same sex marriage! 
I cannot wait to tell my wife about this! Tears of joy as same-sex marriage advocates get the word
Thursday, May 15, 2008
(05-15) 10:45 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- There were whoops of joys and hugs and tears among scores of gay rights advocates and same-sex couples this morning outside the California Supreme Court building in San Francisco as word spread that the justices had cleared the way for gay and lesbian marriages.
Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, a gay rights group, ran out of the building on McAllister Street and screamed, "We won!" just after the decision was released at 10 a.m. Many people unfurled California state flags with rainbow stripes sewn on across the bottom.
"This is an incredibly historic day," said Judy Appel, executive director of Our Families Coalition, who is raising two children with her partner in Berkeley. "I'm so thrilled, I'm so excited for what this means for my family and all Californians."
Dave Chandler, who along with his partner, Jeff Chandler, was a plaintiff in the case, said, "I'm just cheering the joy. I'm feeling the joy all over. I feel that our kids will be well-protected when we have all the rights, responsibilities and benefits that married couples enjoy. The state of California has renewed my hope."
He said his partner was at their San Mateo home watching their two children, ages 1 and 4. The couple were married on Valentine's Day 2004 at San Francisco City Hall, one of nearly 4,000 same-sex weddings that were later annulled by the state Supreme Court.
Stuart Gaffney hugged his partner and proclaimed, "We're going to be newlyweds after 21 years together."
David Bowers and his partner were the first in line at the court clerk's office and the first to get a copy of the decision. The couple were also married at City Hall in 2004.
"That was one of the best things of my life. This is the next best thing," Bowers said. "There's tears everywhere. This can't be bad."
Kate Kendell, executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said of the four justices who voted in favor of gay marriage, "I believe all four votes will be vindicated by history."
The three other justices, "in some future day, will wish they could take it back," she said.
"This is a wonderful day to be alive and to be in this movement," Kendell said.
-
CA State high court's ruling on same-sex marriage to be issued Thursday
2008-05-15 13:55:03
Tomorrow, I will expect to hear the good news!
if the state court rules for same sex marriage, California will be the 2nd (the first is Massachusetts) in the country to allow same sex marrage! I am looking forward to hear more good news from other side of the coast. 
State high court's ruling on same-sex marriage to be issued Thursday
Attorney Shannon Minter, back to camera, is hugged by plaintiff Stuart Gaffney on Tuesday as Gaffney's partner John Lewis, right, looks on. Minter argued on behalf of Lewis and Gaffney in the same-sex marriage case now before the California Supreme Court at the State of California Building in San Francisco. Chronicle photo by Kim Komenich
State high court's ruling on same-sex marriage to be issued Thursday
Protesters stand at the entrance of the State of California Building in San Francisco, where the state Supreme Court heard arguments on the same-sex marriage case Tuesday. Chronicle photo by Kim Komenich
san_francisco122:http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/14/BAMH10MC8M.DTL State high court's ruling on same-sex marriage to be issued Thursday
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
(05-14) 16:46 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- More than four years after San Francisco defied state marriage laws by allowing nearly 4,000 same-sex couples to wed at City Hall, the state Supreme Court is set to decide Thursday whether gays and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry in California.
But the decision, due at 10 a.m., may not be the last word. Conservative religious organizations have submitted more than 1.1 million signatures for an initiative that would amend the state Constitution to outlaw same-sex marriage. If at least 694,354 signatures are found to be valid, a tally that is due by mid-June, the measure would go before the voters in November and would override any court ruling in favor of same-sex marriage.
Californians have already voted once, in 2000, to reaffirm the 1977 state law that defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman. The 2000 initiative, Proposition 22, was not a constitutional amendment.
The marriage case is the most prominent and politically explosive dispute to come before the court in decades. The justices have largely managed to stay out of the public spotlight since 1986, when voters removed Chief Justice Rose Bird and two liberal colleagues who had joined her in overturning nearly all death sentences to come before the court.
The current court, with a 6-1 majority of Republican appointees, has a centrist record on social issues and has ruled in favor of gay-rights advocates in a number of cases, including three decisions in 2005 requiring equal treatment for same-sex parents in disputes over child support and custody. The justices seemed sharply divided at their hearing in the marriage case March 4.
Win or lose, supporters of same-sex marriage have scheduled a "celebration of love and family" at the San Francisco LGBT Center, 1800 Market St., at 5 p.m. Thursday, with similar observances planned in Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Luis Obispo and Palm Springs.
"Express your joy - or frustration - with dignity and resoluteness," the advocacy group Equality California advised participants in an e-mail message.
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, whose order authorizing the City Hall weddings started the chain of events leading to Thursday's ruling, said the case represents progress, regardless of the result.
"Even if we are not successful, we will have pushed the ball forward," said Newsom, who was testifying to a congressional committee today in Washington, D.C., and scrapped a planned trip to Chicago to return to San Francisco on Thursday.
The case began in February 2004, when Newsom told the city clerk to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, saying he doubted the constitutionality of the marriage law. The state's high court halted the weddings a month later, then nullified the marriages in August 2004 and ruled that Newsom lacked the authority to override California law.
The court did not rule on the validity of the law, however, and instead referred the issue to lower courts. Constitutional challenges were immediately filed by 23 couples - including some whose marriages had just been annulled - and by the city of San Francisco.
A Superior Court judge in San Francisco declared the ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional in March 2005. Judge Richard Kramer said the law violated the right to marry the partner of one's choice - a right first established by California's high court in a 1948 ruling allowing interracial marriages - and also constituted sex discrimination.
But a state appeals court upheld the law in October 2006. In a 2-1 ruling, the court said California is entitled to preserve the historic definition of marriage while protecting gays and lesbians from discrimination by granting marital rights to domestic partners, most of whom are same-sex couples.
That is the argument advanced by state Attorney General Jerry Brown's office, which is defending the marriage law in court. Two conservative organizations, the Campaign for California Families and the Prop. 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund, have entered the case and argued that broadening the marriage law to same-sex couples would weaken traditional matrimony.
Massachusetts is the only state whose high court has ruled that the state's constitution gives same-sex couples the right to marry.
The California case is titled In re Marriage Cases, S147999. The ruling will be available at www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions.
